<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ECD Thermosphere Blog &#187; reflow profile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/tag/reflow-profile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ecd.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:11:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Total Heat – Another way to analyze your thermal profile</title>
		<link>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2011/01/21/total-heat-another-way-to-analyze-your-thermal-profile/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=total-heat-another-way-to-analyze-your-thermal-profile</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2011/01/21/total-heat-another-way-to-analyze-your-thermal-profile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Austen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Extracting Parameters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M.O.L.E. MAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflow Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAP Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflow profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Profile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecd.com/blog/?p=676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most popular ways to determine if a thermal profile of an electronic assembly is within specification is to consider the limits placed on four measurements or parameters: Initial Ramp Slope, Soak time, Time Above Liquidus and Peak temperature. Keep these four parameters within the specified (solder paste) limits and you can be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most popular ways to determine if a thermal profile of an electronic assembly is within specification is to consider the limits placed on four measurements or <a href="http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/category/profiling/extracting-parameters/">parameters</a>: Initial Ramp Slope, Soak time, Time Above Liquidus and Peak temperature. Keep these four parameters within the specified (solder paste) limits and you can be assured that you are soldering the parts without damaging them.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/012411_1632_TotalHeatAn1.png" alt="" width="588" height="499" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Figure 1 Typical thermal profile with the four traditional parameters within spec</p>
<p> </p>
<p>There are other ways to look at a profile which can be helpful in determining if the profile may threaten components and showing if it is consistent, both across solder joints, and over time.</p>
<p>In the profile example above, the Time Above Liquidus (TAL)on solder joints 1 and 3 are within 2 seconds, yet channel 3 (from the data; plot not shown for visual clarity) had more readings at higher temperatures. This means that although this part may have the same time above 183ºC, more readings were at temperatures higher than channel 1; higher risk of damage. Also note that the peak temperatures were not far apart; 222.2ºC vs. 223.5ºC.</p>
<p>So we added a new measurement to the <a href="http://www.ecd.com/downloads/download.asp?action=form&amp;file=mm_map_setup">MAP software</a> to not only show Time Above Liquidus, but also consider the temperature values during the TAL portion of the profile. This new measurement has several names: &#8220;Total Heat,&#8221; &#8221; Area Under the Curve,&#8221; or &#8220;Stress Integral.&#8221; It combines the <em>time</em> element of Time Above Liquidus with the <em>temperature </em>measurements during that time to give the Total Heat the component experienced, expressed in degree-seconds.<span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/012411_1632_TotalHeatAn2.png" alt="" width="572" height="486" /><br />
Figure 2 Total Heat measurements (component 1 only shown for clarity)</p>
<p>In this case, even though the Time Above Liquidus values are within 2 seconds and the peak temperature is less than 2 degrees apart, the Total Heat values are 2278º-sec and 2628 º-sec which differ by 350 º-sec! This clearly points out that component 3 had to withstand more Total Heat than component 1 and this simple parameter can now be examined in an instant, using the latest; version 2.18j of MAP software.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecd.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2011%2F01%2F21%2Ftotal-heat-another-way-to-analyze-your-thermal-profile%2F&amp;title=Total%20Heat%20%E2%80%93%20Another%20way%20to%20analyze%20your%20thermal%20profile" id="wpa2a_2"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2011/01/21/total-heat-another-way-to-analyze-your-thermal-profile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Reflow Soldering</title>
		<link>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/05/03/on-reflow-soldering/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=on-reflow-soldering</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/05/03/on-reflow-soldering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 18:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Austen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reflow Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J-STD-075]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflow profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflow Soldering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Profile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecd.com/blog/?p=626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, at ECD we have been in the thermal profiling business for over 25 years. Most of what we profile is the reflow soldering process. There are many others like wave soldering, baking, drying, curing, and a host of other industrial temperature process. Still, reflow soldering is the most popular use for a thermal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, at ECD we have been in the thermal profiling business for over 25 years. Most of what we profile is the reflow soldering process. There are many others like wave soldering, baking, drying, curing, and a host of other industrial temperature process. Still, reflow soldering is the most popular use for a thermal profiler like <a href="http://www.ecd.com/default.aspx" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">the MOLE</span></a>. And yet, most of what can be found on the subject of reflow soldering, at least on the web, focuses on specific portions of the reflow process and not on the entire process as a whole.</p>
<p>For example, component manufacturers would have you avoid certain limits in temperature or temperature change rate (slope) to avoid damaging their parts. And that&#8217;s ok, but that only tells you what to avoid, temperature wise. Most solder paste manufacturers would have you believe that their paste can take most any reflow thermal process so as not to be excluded from purchase. This too is understandable and in reality, most solder pastes are good and will solder your components to your circuit board. Many standards (like <a title="IPC" href="https://portal.ipc.org/Association/Index.htm" target="_blank"><span style="font-family: Calibri;">IPC standards</span></a>) on the subject suggest what your product MUST withstand to be considered robust and not necessarily an <em>ideal</em> reflow process thermal profile. This makes sense, because there is no one reflow thermal profile that will solder every possible circuit board assembly, and standards must be general in their application. Then there are the public websites that are often peppered with bias toward a specific brand of profiler in their description of what&#8217;s important or how to view it.</p>
<p>Each year new talent enters the work force and training in the art of reflow soldering is limited or costly. Worse yet, some learning about the reflow process only occurs from failures caused by incorrect reflow process settings. And perhaps worst of all, many reflow solder machine are still running the same setting set generations ago because no one currently available has the skill to make them better. Just because many industry veterans understand the issues around reflow soldering and thermal profiling does not mean the new talent can hit the road running. And, since most every electronic assembly will pass through either reflow soldering, wave soldering, or sometimes both, I thought it important to take a look at the reflow solder process, dissect it and consider what&#8217;s important to measure and control. <a title="More Information" href="http://ecd.com/media/media/p/54/download.aspx" target="_blank">Click here</a> for the more in-depth look.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecd.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F05%2F03%2Fon-reflow-soldering%2F&amp;title=On%20Reflow%20Soldering" id="wpa2a_4"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/05/03/on-reflow-soldering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diverse Needs, Diverse Solutions – We&#8217;ve got an App for That!</title>
		<link>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/03/29/diverse-needs-diverse-solutions/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=diverse-needs-diverse-solutions</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/03/29/diverse-needs-diverse-solutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Austen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[M.O.L.E. MAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MegaRIDER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OvenCHECKER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OvenRIDER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflow Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MEGARIDER]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oven Profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflow profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super M.O.L.E. Gold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Profile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecd.com/blog/?p=598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many different MOLE profilers and Test Pallets does it take to monitor a reflow solder machine? It depends on who you are and why you are monitoring it? We just want to make sure there are as many tools as there are reasons for running a thermal profile. Here are a few good reasons: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many different MOLE profilers and Test Pallets does it take to monitor a reflow solder machine? It depends on who you are and why you are monitoring it? We just want to make sure there are as many tools as there are reasons for running a thermal profile. Here are a few good reasons:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">1. “I’m from the Metrology lab and it’s time for the annual calibration of your reflow oven.” We’ve got an app for that.  After you’ve finished with the oven’s calibration procedure, you can run the <a href="http://www.ecd.com/products/megamole20/">MegaRIDER-20</a> with a <a href="http://www.ecd.com/products/megarider/">Process Test Pallet</a> to see if the machine is <a href="http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/27/why-do-an-oven-healthcheck-why-calibrate-instruments/">uniform across the conveyor width</a> and has the same heating capacity as it did the last calibration or maintenance.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">2. “I’m the Manufacturing Engineer and our QC Department wants me to show that this oven is in control.” We’ve got an app for that. You probably need more information than the once a year Metrology profile can provide. So weekly you can an <a href="http://www.ecd.com/products/ovenrider/">OvenRIDER</a> and see that every zone in the oven is performing the same using <a href="http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/06/oven-verification-using-ovenrider/">X-Bar R charts</a> to prove it.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">3. “I’m on the New Product introduction team and I need a good recipe to solder a new board without killing the parts.” We’ve got an app for that. The <a href="http://www.ecd.com/products/supermolegold/">Super M.O.L.E.® Gold</a> thermal profiler will let you <a href="http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/category/thermocouple-attachment/">connect T/Cs</a> to the board to see exactly what’s going on, thermally, on the areas where you and the designer have the most concern. Use the Prediction tools in the new <a href="http://www.ecd.com/products/megamolemap/">MAP software</a> to lock in the perfect recipe.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">4. “I’m a Line Technician and I have to know my reflow oven is ready to run product without all the wires and circuit board stuff.” We’ve got an app for that. <a href="http://www.ecd.com/products/ovenchecker/">OvenCHECKER</a> is one pallet loaded with the most powerful profiler on the market today. It takes no more time to run than the first production board and it lets you know if the reflow oven is ready or not. No downloading, no comparing numbers on a chart, just <a href="http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/25/the-fastest-way-to-know-your-profile-is-ok/">Go, or No-Go</a>.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecd.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F03%2F29%2Fdiverse-needs-diverse-solutions%2F&amp;title=Diverse%20Needs%2C%20Diverse%20Solutions%20%E2%80%93%20We%26%238217%3Bve%20got%20an%20App%20for%20That%21" id="wpa2a_6"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/03/29/diverse-needs-diverse-solutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fastest Way to Know Your profile is “OK”</title>
		<link>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/25/the-fastest-way-to-know-your-profile-is-ok/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-fastest-way-to-know-your-profile-is-ok</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/25/the-fastest-way-to-know-your-profile-is-ok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Austen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Extracting Parameters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M.O.L.E. MAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading Profiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflow Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Profiler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ok Button]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflow profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V-MOLE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/25/the-fastest-way-to-know-your-profile-is-%e2%80%9cok%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now there is a way to verify that your profile requirements are being met in less time than you ever thought possible. The letters in the name M.O.L.E.® thermal profiler have always stood for Multi-channel Occurrent Logger Evaluator. Now the patented* &#8220;OK button&#8221; feature truly makes &#8220;E&#8221; in MOLE a reality, because now the MOLE [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Now there is a way to verify that your profile requirements are being met in less time than you ever thought possible. The letters in the name M.O.L.E.® thermal profiler have always stood for <span style="text-decoration: underline;">M</span>ulti-channel <span style="text-decoration: underline;">O</span>ccurrent <span style="text-decoration: underline;">L</span>ogger <span style="text-decoration: underline;">E</span>valuator. Now the patented* &#8220;OK button&#8221; feature truly makes &#8220;E&#8221; in MOLE a reality, because now the MOLE profiler can automatically compare the measured temperature profile to your pre-programmed profile requirements.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/022510_2147_TheFastestW1.jpg" alt="" width="316" height="282" /><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The ECD V-MOLE with patented one button &#8220;OK&#8221; profile evaluation<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 8pt;">(The OK Button is also available on the 20-channel <strong><em>MEGA</em>M.O.L.E.™</strong> thermal profiler, and OvenCHECKER™ )<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Taking only seconds, the MOLE can tell you and your oven operators if the profile just measured is in or out of specification with the universally understood Green for good (GO!) or Red for bad (STOP!).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">You get to set the specification limits for any or all of the four most popular profile parameters:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Ramp Slope<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Time Between temperatures<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Time above Liquidous<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Peak Temperature<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">…and you can choose which of the MOLE&#8217;s input channels to include, up to 20 channels on the <em>MEGA</em>M.O.L.E.™, and three on the V-M.O.L.E.™ thermal profilers.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/022510_2147_TheFastestW2.png" alt="" /><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">The Specification Table in MAP Software<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Using the MAP™ Profiling software, enter your specification limits for the four profile parameters in the Upper and Lower Limits table in the &#8220;<strong><em>Target-10 OK</em></strong>&#8221; tab. These values will automatically be sent to the MOLE profiler when you use the <strong><em>Verify Process Wizard</em></strong> to confirm that a previously characterized oven recipe is still performing within specification.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/022510_2147_TheFastestW3.png" alt="" /><span style="font-family: Arial;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-family: Arial;">MAP™ Profiling Software <strong><em>Target-10 OK</em></strong> Profile tab<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">Once programmed, the MOLE profiler can be used many times (up to 96 times) to Verify your oven is producing the same profile, without reconnecting to your computer. Simply run the profile and press the &#8220;OK Button&#8221; on the MOLE. No more running back to the PC software to download to see the results. One push of the OK button, and you get your answer…Go, or No-Go. It&#8217;s that simple!</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Arial;">*U.S. Patent Number 7653502.</span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecd.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F02%2F25%2Fthe-fastest-way-to-know-your-profile-is-ok%2F&amp;title=The%20Fastest%20Way%20to%20Know%20Your%20profile%20is%20%E2%80%9COK%E2%80%9D" id="wpa2a_8"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/25/the-fastest-way-to-know-your-profile-is-ok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why do an Oven HealthCHECK™? Why Calibrate Instruments?</title>
		<link>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/27/why-do-an-oven-healthcheck-why-calibrate-instruments/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-do-an-oven-healthcheck-why-calibrate-instruments</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/27/why-do-an-oven-healthcheck-why-calibrate-instruments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Austen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reflow Oven Verification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflow Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thermal Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine Process Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oven HealthCHECK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oven Verification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflow profile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/27/why-do-an-oven-healthcheck-%e2%84%a2-why-calibrate-instruments/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do an Oven HealthCHECK™? Why Calibrate Instruments? You might ask, why should I perform an Oven HealthCHECK? In other words, why should I run a rather sophisticated measurement system through my oven to produce a rather nice looking 3-D plot of the cross belt temperature uniformity? Figure 1: An example 3-D plot of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do an Oven HealthCHECK™? Why Calibrate Instruments?</p>
<p>You might ask, why should I perform an Oven HealthCHECK? In other words, why should I run a rather sophisticated measurement system through my oven to produce a rather nice looking 3-D plot of the cross belt temperature uniformity?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/012710_1705_WhydoanOven1.png" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Figure 1: An example 3-D plot of the oven with very good cross belt uniformity, &lt; 3ºC</p>
<p>I may not like the answer because I might find out my oven has a problem that I cannot fix? Sounds like a &#8220;head in the sand&#8221; sort of excuse to me.</p>
<p>I would ask a different question: &#8220;Why do you calibrate your bench test instruments?&#8221; Is it to find out that the instrument is out of spec? Heavens no!! That would be a nightmare because it would call into question everything that instrument was used to test since the last time it was calibrated. So why do you calibrate if the results could be so disastrous? Simple, it allows you to show and document that the instrument is and always has been &#8220;within specification.&#8221; So when the auditor asks, how do know your instruments are in calibration, you pull out the Certificates of Calibration.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/012710_1705_WhydoanOven3.png" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Figure: What&#8217;s the first thing you check after you receive your Certificates of Calibration? The &#8220;As Received: Within Tolerance&#8221;</p>
<p>ECD&#8217;s Oven HealthCHECK is designed to certify and document your oven&#8217;s performance or health. It is a &#8220;calibration&#8221; done on a regular interval, say once a year, to show that the oven performance is within specification and not changing over time. It can also provide a baseline level of performance around which you can compare into the future. Further, if you have several ovens, the HealthCHECK can show you which ovens are best for applications where oven uniformity is critical.</p>
<p>Back this up with much simpler and more frequent verification profiles of your oven using OvenRIDER or OvenCHECKER, where simple software-generated Xbar-R control charts show daily indications of a thermal process that is &#8220;in control,&#8221; and you will no longer have to steer the auditor around your reflow oven. You can proudly show that you know your oven&#8217;s performance level and that it is consistent because you have taken the steps to measure your oven&#8217;s health as part of your Thermal Quality Management program. Such a program should be marketed, since it shows you commitment to understanding your oven&#8217;s thermal nature and you have the data to show it. This sure beats the &#8220;head in the sand&#8221; quality program which may characterize your competition.</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecd.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2010%2F01%2F27%2Fwhy-do-an-oven-healthcheck-why-calibrate-instruments%2F&amp;title=Why%20do%20an%20Oven%20HealthCHECK%E2%84%A2%3F%20Why%20Calibrate%20Instruments%3F" id="wpa2a_10"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2010/01/27/why-do-an-oven-healthcheck-why-calibrate-instruments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verifying Wave Solder Machines using a WaveRIDER</title>
		<link>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/28/verifying-wave-solder-machines-using-waverider/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=verifying-wave-solder-machines-using-waverider</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/28/verifying-wave-solder-machines-using-waverider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul Austen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Wave Solder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wave Solder Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine Process Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflow profile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WaveRIDER]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecd.com/blog/?p=515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Much of what takes place in a Wave solder machine boils down to 4 basic measurements: (see Figure 1) (Max preheat) How hot the board is just before it hits the wave (Dwell time) how long do you spend in the wave (Contact temp) Temperature of the solder at the contact surface with the board [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of what takes place in a Wave solder machine boils down to 4 basic measurements:<br />
(see Figure 1)</p>
<ol>
<li>(Max preheat) How hot the board is just before it hits the wave</li>
<li>(Dwell time) how long do you spend in the wave</li>
<li>(Contact temp) Temperature of the solder at the contact surface with the board</li>
<li>Conveyor speed</li>
</ol>
<p>All the rest of the many measurable parameters are secondary to these in my opinion. Let&#8217;s talk a little about each of these as measured by the WaveRIDER SPC software:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class=" aligncenter" src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/092809_1732_VerifyingWa2-591x430-custom.png" alt="" width="591" height="430" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman; font-size:10pt"><strong>Figure 1: WaveRIDER SPC Software<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong><span id="more-515"></span>Max Preheat temp</strong> (Preheat Max Temp) is really the temperature of the board (solder joints) just before it hits the wave so you can understand the &#8220;shock&#8221; the solder joint will get when contact with the wave forces it to melt the solder in a quick few seconds. This temp may NOT be the max preheat temp applied because most wave machines have a large gap between the pre-heater and the solder wave so the board will loose some of the heat during that space/time.</p>
<p><strong>The Dwell time</strong> is how long the solder will be above liquidous, all said and done, and this time needs to be consistent across the width of the wave (AKA: parallelism), but you can see consistency across the wave just as easy by setting a min/max spec for the three dwell times. How long you must dwell is a function your solder joint requirements and components ability to withstand the wave temp. Most component specs say they can take 10 seconds or less and most solder joints need only a second to form. <strong>The longer you spend above liquidous the more time you give to form the brittle &#8220;intermetallic&#8221; alloy between the not molten metals</strong>. So the only reason you dwell at all is to get the heat to travel up the lead to the board top (on through-hole parts), which may take a few seconds depending on the thermal conductivity of the board and its thickness. A pot of liquid solder has plenty of heat to force into a board, so it depends mostly on the thermal conductivity of the board material itself. You will have to watch/trial your assembly (board) to see just how long that takes so you can set a minimum dwell time. The Dwell time is usually about 2.5 seconds for most 0.062&#8243; (1.6mm) thick boards and this can vary +/- 10% to 15%.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/092809_1732_VerifyingWa3.png" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman; font-size:10pt"><strong>Figure 2: Wave crest pattern<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Pot temp</strong> at the solder contact surface (Contact temp) does vary depending on the load (your board) places on the surface of the solder wave. It is not the same as the solder pot temp, since that temp is controlled by a Thermocouple deep in the core of the solder pot and not the surface where the board skims across. This temperature should be maintained at least 20ºC or more above liquidous and no more then the maximum temperature allowed by the component specifications.</p>
<p><strong>The conveyor speed</strong> is measured by dividing 9.75&#8243; (distance between C and Speed sensors on the WaveRIDER pallet, see Figure 4) by the time measured between the C and Speed sensors hitting the main wave. It is easy to see why this is an important measure since ALL other values will be altered if the conveyor speed changes. Most solder machines can maintain speeds within +/-0.1 ft/minute (+/-1.2 in/minute, +/-3cm/minute)</p>
<p><strong>Immersion depth</strong> is only important to prevent solder from spilling over the top of the board during wave contact. The absolute setting is not critical provided it is NOT spilling over the board and its depth is affording the dwell time one needs. However, it is easier to adjust the conveyor speed to control dwell time then the board&#8217;s immersion depth and risk a spill over. This is usually controlled by pump RPMs and how full the pot is of solder. If these change over time, the dwell times slowly change and thus is be one of the reasons for dwell changes. However, neither can be directly measured by WaveRIDER which has no chance to access the pump&#8217;s RPMs or the amount of solder in the pot.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion:<br />
</strong>Focus your efforts on the critical WaverRIDER measurements by setting reasonable specifications. The many other things the WaveRIDER measures are not as critical, and can be used to diagnose a problem if there is one rather then used to prove there is NO problem. Use the WaveRIDER SPC software to set Spec limits and plot X-Bar R charts for these critical parameters. (Figure 3)</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class=" aligncenter" src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/092809_1732_VerifyingWa4-601x624-custom.png" alt="" width="601" height="624" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman; font-size:10pt"><strong>Figure 3: X-Bar R charts<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.ecd.com/products/waverider/"><img class=" aligncenter" title="WaveRIDER" src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/092809_1732_VerifyingWa5-604x323-custom.png" alt="" width="604" height="323" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-family:Times New Roman; font-size:10pt"><strong>Figure 4: Keep the WaveRIDER pallet contacts clean using a fine wire brush. This will reduce oxide build up on the sensors which can cause the Dwell times vary beyond normal.<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecd.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F09%2F28%2Fverifying-wave-solder-machines-using-waverider%2F&amp;title=Verifying%20Wave%20Solder%20Machines%20using%20a%20WaveRIDER" id="wpa2a_12"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/28/verifying-wave-solder-machines-using-waverider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thermally Sensitive Components and J-STD-075</title>
		<link>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/26/thermally-sensitive-components-and-j-std-075/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=thermally-sensitive-components-and-j-std-075</link>
		<comments>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/26/thermally-sensitive-components-and-j-std-075/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rex Breunsbach</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reflow Profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J-STD-075]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflow profile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecd.com/blog/?p=188</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  Good solder joints are not enough.  A good reflow profile must consider component temperature limitations. The new IPC standard released Dec 08, Classification of Non-IC Electronic Components for Assembly Processes, J-STD-075, calls for thermal classification of components, and recommends a marking system to help contract manufactures recognize component temperature limits during the soldering process.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.ecd.com/solutions/electronics/images/badcaps.jpg" alt="" width="129" height="171" /></span></strong></p>
<p><strong></strong> </p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Good solder joints are not enough.  A good reflow profile must consider component temperature limitations.</span></strong></p>
<p>The new IPC standard released Dec 08, Classification of Non-IC Electronic Components for Assembly Processes, J-STD-075, calls for thermal classification of components, and recommends a marking system to help contract manufactures recognize component temperature limits during the soldering process.  <span style="color: #0000ff;">Failures don’t show up during initial test, but much later on in the product’s life – often six months to two years later</span>, and well below forecasts that drive pricing and warranty policies. ALL parts have temperature limits; and until we take the time to profile the process to which we subject these parts, we can’t know if we cause harm or not.</p>
<p>ECD has moved in that direction with our Thermal Quality Management (ThQM™) Program. We think this will give the industry the knowledge and tools to look at ALL components in the comprehensive light necessary. Equally important, it introduces a program and method of dialog between OEM and EMS provider on soldering process issues.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ecd.com/solutions/electronics/thqm.asp" target="_blank">View full details here</a></p>
<p><script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/ScreamingCircuits?i=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.screamingcircuits.com%2F2009%2F03%2Frohs-temps-may-still-kill-rohs-parts.html" type="text/javascript"></script><script src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~s/ScreamingCircuits?i=http%3A//blog.screamingcircuits.com/2009/03/rohs-temps-may-still-kill-rohs-parts.html&amp;showad=true" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd a2a_target addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save#url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecd.com%2Fblog%2Findex.php%2F2009%2F03%2F26%2Fthermally-sensitive-components-and-j-std-075%2F&amp;title=Thermally%20Sensitive%20Components%20and%20J-STD-075" id="wpa2a_14"><img src="http://www.ecd.com/blog/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share"/></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ecd.com/blog/index.php/2009/03/26/thermally-sensitive-components-and-j-std-075/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

